Law firms
Client confidentiality and privilege make third-party processing of matter files a serious question. A private AI system lets attorneys search and summarize their own documents without a single page leaving the firm.
Rochester, NY · Remote-first · Regulated industries
Law firms, healthcare organizations, and financial institutions want the productivity of modern AI without exposing privileged, protected, or nonpublic data to a third-party API. I design and build private AI systems and the infrastructure under them, so your data, your models, and your logs stay inside your boundary.
The same architecture serves three kinds of organization, each with a different reason the public cloud is off the table.
Client confidentiality and privilege make third-party processing of matter files a serious question. A private AI system lets attorneys search and summarize their own documents without a single page leaving the firm.
Protected health information carries strict handling duties. Local models can draft, summarize, and answer questions over internal records and policies while the data stays on systems you govern.
Nonpublic client financial information, examination readiness, and vendor risk reviews all get simpler when no external model provider is involved in processing the data.
Four connected services take you from a defined data boundary to working, supported systems.
Service 01
I size, build, and harden a large language model environment that runs entirely on infrastructure you control: a workstation, a rack server, or a dedicated GPU node. You get a working assistant, an access model, and documentation your IT staff can run without me.
See how the pieces fit in the Project S.P.H.E.R.E. AI infrastructure case study.
Service 02
Retrieval-augmented generation lets a model answer questions from your own documents and cite where the answer came from. I build the full pipeline privately: ingestion, chunking, embeddings, a vector database, retrieval, and a user interface, with permissions that respect who is allowed to see which documents.
Retrieval quality, not model size, usually decides whether a RAG system earns trust. Every build includes a test set drawn from your real questions.
Service 03
Most IT teams lose hours every week to repetitive Windows Server, Active Directory, and helpdesk work. I automate the routine with PowerShell, Python, and local AI, with human approval kept in front of every change that matters.
Service 04
Direct senior architecture, escalation engineering, and operational advisory built on 20+ years of owning and operating Managed Service Providers—including leading Computer Service Specialists of New York (CSSNY).
Step 1
We map what data you hold, who may see it, and which systems may never touch it.
Step 2
I produce the architecture, hardware specification, and a fixed-scope plan for review by your team and counsel.
Step 3
We stand up the nodes, load your data, test retrieval and access controls, and document everything.
Step 4
Your staff gets runbooks and training. Ongoing support is optional and scoped separately.
A private AI system is an infrastructure project first. It needs networks that are segmented correctly, servers that are patched and backed up, identity that is managed, and logs someone actually reads. I have spent 28 years running exactly those systems, from enterprise Windows environments and Active Directory to virtualization, networking, and disaster recovery.
That background is why the AI layer I build behaves like production infrastructure and not a demo. It is also why I will tell you plainly when a task does not need AI at all.
Read the full biography and career history of Michael P. Goodman.
It is a design approach in which your sensitive data, your AI models, and the infrastructure that runs them stay under your control. Prompts, documents, embeddings, and logs are processed on systems you own or dedicate to your organization, and no public AI API sits in the data path.
For many organizations a contract is enough. For firms that handle privileged legal files, protected health information, or nonpublic financial records, a contractual promise still leaves a third party processing the data. A local deployment removes that third party, which simplifies your risk analysis and your conversations with clients, auditors, and counsel.
No architecture makes an organization compliant by itself. Compliance depends on your policies, your people, and the determinations of your counsel and auditors. A sovereign design removes a major category of exposure and gives you the technical controls, logging, and documentation those reviewers ask for.
It depends on the model size, the number of concurrent users, and the response speed you need. Small teams often start with a single workstation-class GPU server. Larger deployments use multiple GPUs or dedicated nodes. Every engagement begins with a sizing assessment so you buy what the workload requires and no more.
Yes. Michael P. Goodman is based in Rochester, NY and works remotely with clients in regulated industries. Hardware installation can be done by your team or a local partner under a documented build specification.
I am Michael P. Goodman, a Rochester, New York technology architect with 28 years in IT and more than 20 years as a business owner. I led Computer Service Specialists of New York as president from 2014 to 2024. You work with me directly, not with a rotating team.
Tell me what data you hold and what you want AI to do with it. I will respond with a clear view of what can run locally, what it needs, and what it should cost to build.